Blog powered by TypePad

Blogroll - Sites I Dig

Categories

June 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Categories

« November 2007 | Main | January 2008 »

December 21, 2007

Starbucks Entertainment Officially Jumps the Shark

Kenny G.  No artist's name makes the hair on my neck stand up straighter.  As someone who got involved with the music business in the 90s from a love of jazz and during the "jazz renaissance" of that decade Kenny was, in my opinion, the epitome of everything wrong with music.  The saccharine sounds.  The Michael Bolton connection.  The complete lack of soul.  Sure, the guy had chops up the ying-yang, but to what end?  The coup de grace was when he paired himself with the disembodied voice of the deceased scion of jazz music: Louis Armstrong, for a "duet" on "What a Wonderful World."

I'm a pretty inclusive music consumer and listener.  I listen to all kinds of music, even the occassional smooth jazz record.  But I draw the line with Kenny G.  Today, Starbucks Entertainment announced an exclusive release with the above-mentioned Mr. G.

When I worked at Universal Music Special Markets I really wanted to work on the Starbucks account.  They had always approached music with a very sure-handed and opinionated curatorial sensibility.  Certain music worked for their brand.  Certain music didn't.  I distnctly remember one of the first meetings I attended with someone from Starbucks in 1999.  We had someone from Verve Music Group in on the meeting.  That person tried to pitch Starbucks on doing a smooth jazz CD as part of the company's branded CD compilations for the coming year.  They Starbucks employee looked at our Verve guy like he had two heads. 

Smooth jazz was not what Starbucks was about.  They emphasized artistic quality and warmth, intimacy and collaboration.  They did instrumental jazz compilations, singer-songwriter collections, blues, Brazilian music, world music, even some classical and opera.  The music for the brand had a point of view.

Starbucks never did too much advertising.  Their advertising was their product and their stores, and the environment created in those stores.  The couches and the ability to sit and enjoy your latte were part of that environment, but the music playing in the in-store bed was what you felt, what made you feel like sitting and staying at Starbucks, that being there was worth the price of that latte.  And the music on the Starbucks CDs and the music being piped in were synched up.  When you bought one of those CDs you could take a little piece of the Starbucks brand experience home with you.

Even as Starbucks purchased Hear Music and became more ambitious, the artistic specificity remained in their brand point of view.  They launched the "Artist's Choice" series of CDs, where musicians would create compilations based on their artistic taste.  And they chose artists that furthered the Starbucks brand's image as tastemaker: Lucinda Williams, Willie Nelson, Yo-Yo Ma, Elvis Costello, Diana Krall, Norah Jones, and many others (not all the titles are in print anymore).  Even on their "Opus collection" single-artist greatest hits packages they were able to delve into some very significant artist catalogs that were normally difficult to license: John Lennon, Bob Marley & the Wailers, Jimi Hendrix, Frank Sinatra, and The Doors, to name a few.  For this they should be recognized and applauded.

Starbucks also became a more significant account for selling frontline records, records which not many other accounts were carrying.  They championed artists who were releasing good records rather than just carrying the latest record the labels wanted them to flog.

After the groundbreaking partnership with Concord Records which was responsible for the Ray Charles mega-hit Genius Loves Company the company was sitting even prettier.  But, after the massive, Grammy-winning triumph of Ray Charles that curator's sense of knowing what was right for the brand diminished.

Starbucks is a huge brand, with a massive retail footprint.  At some point earlier this decade the company decided that the exclusiveness of the type of music Hear Music was producing and buying needed to diversify to account for a wider, more diverse customer base that crossed many different age cohorts.

So there is no longer a "Starbucks sound" per se.  Starbucks can't do deals with Kenny G AND Joni Mitchell and expect there to be continued trust in the brand's musical taste or sensibility among its customers.  Similarly, on the frontline side the Starbucks Entertainment team is now stocking more big hits and well-known artists: Led Zeppelin, Alicia Keys, Wyclef Jean are current highlighted titles.  And the titles released by Starbucks by Paul McCartney, Joni Mitchell, and James Taylor haven't excited customers as much as they've generated PR buzz.

Starbucks has always aimed to be the "third place" in people's lives, other than home and work.  But, more so than they realize, Starbucks' music initiative, from its beginnings, has helped give the brand the respect it needs to keep people trusting in their brand experience.    I mean, even the baristas can't be excited at the prospect of having to have Kenny G music piped into the stores.

Starbucks needs to reclaim their musical mojo - not just take on projects because they can.  If the gentleman from Starbucks I know who delivered that "no smooth jazz" edict to Verve back in 1999 is still working at the company I can hardly imagine how disappointed he is in this choice by the company he's worked at for so long and done so much for in developing their music business.

December 20, 2007

I Guess Colleges Aren't Teaching Ethics 101

David Pogue writes for the New York Times' Circuits section.  He describes how at various speaking engagements he has developed an exercise for his audiences, a kind of morality scale as to what downloading activities people consider immoral or unethical.

His great shock came when he presented this standard exercise at a college lecture.  I've posted what Pogue said about this experience below, but it ought to give anyone of my readers involved in a copyright-intensive industry: music, TV, fim, software, etc... ample pause as we consider what the generations now in college and growing up will deem just and right as we try and earn our livings off of created works.

In an auditorium of 500, no matter how far my questions went down that garden path, maybe two hands went up. I just could not find a spot on the spectrum that would trigger these kids' morality alarm. They listened to each example, looking at me like I was nuts.

Finally, with mock exasperation, I said, "O.K., let's try one that's a little less complicated: You want a movie or an album. You don't want to pay for it. So you download it."

There it was: the bald-faced, worst-case example, without any nuance or mitigating factors whatsoever.

"Who thinks that might be wrong?"

Two hands out of 500.

Now, maybe there was some peer pressure involved; nobody wants to look like a goody-goody.

Maybe all this is obvious to you, and maybe you could have predicted it. But to see this vivid demonstration of the generational divide, in person, blew me away.

There it is in black and white.  Now, I'm sure if Pogue were to ask this question in front ot students at Berklee College of Music or Belmont University's Mike Curb College of Entertainment & Music Business he'd get different responses, but I think overall, on campuses across the nation, the type of response Pogue saw would be the norm.

December 17, 2007

Advertising Age's "2007 Best Ad Songs" / Make a DEAL

Advertising Age has posted their Top 10 "2007 Best Ad Songs," noting their favorite uses of music in TV advertising campaigns.

I can see how some of these songs made the Top 10.  I love the Apple, Old Navy, JC Penney, Dove and Volkswagen ads.  I have mentioned the Volkswagen/Wilco partnership before, and it played out rather nicely in the execution.  Ingrid Michaelson, whose "The Way I Am" was featured in the Old Navy ad, questioned her own integrity when some fans ragged on her for "selling out."

I find the whole "selling out" argument to be passe.  As I commented on No Depression magazine's "Peter's Postscripts" blog - artists "sell out" to corporations every day, namely their labels and radio conglomerates.  Yet somehow Z100 or Island Records, for example, are considered holy while licensing music for a :30 spot is considered blasphemy.  Sometimes I just don't understand how people think.

I was somewhat surprised to see that one of my all-time favorite bands - IRON MAIDEN - had licensed their 1988 hit "Can I Play With Madness?" to Sony Electronics for a commercial about HDTV - easily listed as one of the "Most Questionable Ad Songs of 2007" by Ad Age.  I was less surprised Maiden licensed the track (though this is the first instance I've seen of the band licensing ANYTHING) than the agency chose that song to help deliver the message the ad was trying to send.  I found the ad preposterous just from the visuals, and when Maiden's track is added the effect is just dreadful.

From a personal perspective - I find it unbelievable that Country music has such little representation in modern TV advertising.  A colleague of mine blamed it on music publishers who seek too high a price for their sync licenses.  Many agencies still relegate music licensing, in terms of budget and creative importance, to the proverbial back of the bus.  And supply of licensable music far outweighs demand, making it a buyers market.  Sellers beware.

We can see from this list that being a current act on a major label, or even major indie label, bears little correlation to the music agencies license for their clients.  My dear artist, music publishing, and label friends, take note.  Be flexible and make deals happen.  Be proactive.  Survive and thrive - don't be watching the oncoming light become the express train as retail shrinks and radio airplay tightens.  Music exists to be listened to - however people or corporations choose to consume it.  Use that to enhance your own revenue streams and profitability.

December 14, 2007

Indies Account for 38% of Country Music Top 100 Airplay Tracks for 2007

Taylor Swift.  Toby Keith.  Rascal Flatts.  Rodney Atkins.  Tracy Lawrence.  Tim McGraw.  Garth Brooks.  Trisha Yearwood.  Emerson Drive.  Jason Aldean.  Little Big Town.  Jack Ingram.

These are just a few of the artists who dominated Country radio in 2007.  Nielsen's year-end BDS chart for Country music airplay are out, and, by my count, independent labels (which does not mean these some of labels don't have distribution via major labels) account for 38% of the Top 100 Songs of the year.  That's got to be some kind of high-water mark in this era of major label consolidation.  Here's the label breakdown.  Here's the top artist breakdown.

I don't know if this is a tipping point for the rise to prominence of the indie label scene in Nashville, because a label's individual financial health and future is based on much more than radio airplay.  But it ought to be a signal that the major labels are not the only place to find talented, charismatic artists creating commercial art.

I don't have the countdown breakdown by music publisher, but so many indie publishers involved with country music are having incredible successes as well.

So are we in an era of de-consolidation?  Do artists, songwriters, and publishers feel encouraged?  Challenged?  Emboldened?  Insecure?  Please let me know your thoughts.

Take care.